I know this blog is usually rife 
with my depressed musings or cryptic natter about the people I currently
 hate, but today I will be commenting on something really important: How
 badly DC is mishandling its cinematic universe. 
 
Growing
 up, I was much more familiar with the DC Comics universe than I was 
with Marvel's. I mean, apart from the X-Men and Spider-man, I wasn't too
 familiar with now-famous characters like Hawkeye and Black Widow. Or 
for that matter even Iron Man. (To be honest, I knew more about Ant-Man 
than I did Iron Man. And Thor was mostly a joke.) 
Meanwhile,
 over in DC-verse resided my all-time favourite comic book hero (or 
anti-hero) - Batman. Even casual comic book fans know Superman, Wonder 
Woman, the Flash and Aquaman. 
The
 difference has been in the movie universe. The Marvel Cinematic 
Universe (MCU henceforth) was masterfully set up under the guidance of 
Kevin Feige from the start. Even movies that didn't work too well 
(notably the first two Hulk movies) were interesting. 
Enough
 virtual ink has been devoted to why MCU is has been successful; from 
choosing great scriptwriters and directors, to casting the right actors 
(starting with Robert Downey Jr.) and picking the right comic book arcs 
(most notably the Winter Soldier arc from Captain America) to bring to 
the cinema, Kevin Feige has made a series of right decisions. However, 
the decision that I think deserves the most credit is the one that 
allowed MCU to build a world, with rules and over-arching villains and 
heroes that could co-exist. Each superhero was fleshed out but still 
belonged to the same world as all the others. That is no mean feat. 
Meanwhile,
 over at DC, apart from a few good choices, all I can see is the 
squandering of great comic book properties. To be fair, Arrow on the CW 
(a TV show based on the Green Arrow comics, for the uninitiated) is 
great. It may even be responsible for a successful spin-off in the form 
of the Flash, who is a truly beloved character from the comics. And of 
course, it goes without saying that the Christopher Nolan's Batman 
movies were stellar, with the second being an absolute masterpiece (and 
arguably the greatest comic book movie ever made).
HOWEVER,
 with news emerging in the last week about DC giving Zack Snyder the 
keys to the kingdom, a la Joss Whedon over at MCU, I am now truly afraid
 for what is to come. 
Snyder
 directed last year's Man of Steel and is now scheduled to direct Batman
 vs. Superman as well as a Justice League movie to release in 2017. 
First
 off, Man of Steel was just awful. I mean plain terrible. The last 40 
minutes of the movie is just one long rampage that was directed with all
 the subtlety of a drag show. Most people left the theatre with a 
headache. Henry Cavill, and I am sorry in advance to anyone who liked 
him in the movie, was an abysmal Superman. I will reserve judgement on 
Ben Affleck and Gal Gadot as Batman and Wonder Woman because I know 
nerds (like me) often have a reputation for losing their shit online 
over casting choices for their favourite comic book characters and then 
having to eat their words at a performance like Heath Ledger in as The 
Joker (in case you didn't know or don't remember, us nerds lost our 
ever-loving minds when he was cast). 
My
 bigger problem is with Zack Snyder. He is well-known for fetishizing 
women in his movies, with some feminists going so far as to claim that 
he outright indulges in rape fantasies in many of his films. How can he 
possibly be allowed to have a hand in bringing to life the greatest 
female superhero i.e. Wonder Woman? Compare that to Whedon who was 
responsible for writing one of the best, most kick-ass, feminist heroes 
in Buffy The Vampire Slayer. Snyder also has a very heavy hand and is 
not too well known for developing characters with nuance and 
complications. Whereas, DC has some of the most complex characters in 
its universe. My fear is that his Batman will just be a billionaire who 
beats up bad guys at night (in a highly-stylized manner, no doubt; 
another major criticism leveled against Snyder has been his emphasis on 
style over substance) instead of the broken man who saw his parents 
killed before him and developed a complex moral code as a result. 
His
 Superman has already proven to be an angsty whine-machine who did not 
seem to hesitate to snap his antagonist's neck. Now, this point is worth
 discussing. I didn't have as much of a problem as other fans when 
Superman killed General Zod at the end of Man of Steel. My issue was 
that it came in the first movie itself and that too without taking pains
 to establish Superman's sense of responsibility and his highly-rigid 
honour code. He is referred to as Boy Scout in the comics because he is 
adamant that he will not kill. In fact, many Justice League stories have
 been born from his vast divergence in morality from Batman. Snyder did 
not establish this moral code and instead just showed him violating it. 
We should have been shown what a very big deal it is that Superman had 
to resort to killing someone and what kind of toll that could take on 
him. 
Finally,
 DC hasn't taken pains to develop a universe before jumping straight 
away into a Justice League movie. How are casual fans supposed to know 
who Cyborg is? Which version of Aquaman will they be presenting and what
 will his character be like? And will characters like the Green Arrow 
and The Flash appear in the movie even though they exist in a parallel 
universe on TV shows? 
So,
 here's the thing, I am very unhappy with the choices made over at DC 
and had to put down all my objections. I doubt any of the people that 
read this blog care as deeply about this stuff as I do. Still, it's 
worth mentioning. I'm not one to solicit feedback on my weird rants, but
 in this particular case, if you read this blog, comment and let me know
 what comic book movies you like and why.